<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.6" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Information Quality in Black and White</title>
	<link>http://www.architected.info/blog/testing-information-quality</link>
	<description>How people, practices, and information are transformed into relationships and understanding.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.6</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Architected Information &#187; Two Methods for Defining Information Quality</title>
		<link>http://www.architected.info/blog/testing-information-quality#comment-281</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 12:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.architected.info/blog/testing-information-quality#comment-281</guid>
					<description>[...] With this in mind, is semantic definition the most efficient way to improve information quality? Is a statistical definition the most descriptive way to understand information quality? We will explore both of these methods in the next part of this series.  Share and earn some karma ...These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] With this in mind, is semantic definition the most efficient way to improve information quality? Is a statistical definition the most descriptive way to understand information quality? We will explore both of these methods in the next part of this series.  Share and earn some karma &#8230;These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Architected Information &#187; Case Study &#8212; Semantic Information Quality</title>
		<link>http://www.architected.info/blog/testing-information-quality#comment-96</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 20:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.architected.info/blog/testing-information-quality#comment-96</guid>
					<description>[...] When an organization begins a concerted effort to improve its information quality, often it gets stuck in trying to figure out exactly where to start. Previously, we had discussed the semantic and statistical approaches to information quality and linked them to black box and white box testing (you may want to take a look at these if you aren&#8217;t familiar with the subjects, as these are the basis for this article). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] When an organization begins a concerted effort to improve its information quality, often it gets stuck in trying to figure out exactly where to start. Previously, we had discussed the semantic and statistical approaches to information quality and linked them to black box and white box testing (you may want to take a look at these if you aren&#8217;t familiar with the subjects, as these are the basis for this article). [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
