<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.6" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Market-Based Information Architecture</title>
	<link>http://www.architected.info/blog/market-based-information-architecture</link>
	<description>How people, practices, and information are transformed into relationships and understanding.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.6</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Architected Information &#187; Musings on Metadata and Compliance</title>
		<link>http://www.architected.info/blog/market-based-information-architecture#comment-508</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.architected.info/blog/market-based-information-architecture#comment-508</guid>
					<description>[...] Regulation and the threat of real penalties for inaccuracies in reporting. People got interested enough to protect their own hides. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Regulation and the threat of real penalties for inaccuracies in reporting. People got interested enough to protect their own hides. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Architected Information &#187; Think Locally, Act Locally</title>
		<link>http://www.architected.info/blog/market-based-information-architecture#comment-79</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2006 21:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.architected.info/blog/market-based-information-architecture#comment-79</guid>
					<description>[...] There is a real difference of opinion between the folks who think there should be a single view of the customer and those who advocate a more organic methodology (like a market-based approach). After watching several different companies try to implement a single data repository and overall data model I have mixed feelings about the whole thing. For the most part, they seemed to be political exercises to try and force compliance in using a solution that did not meet the needs of business units. At the same time, there is very real value to be gained through integration and shared resources (especially with business intelligence). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] There is a real difference of opinion between the folks who think there should be a single view of the customer and those who advocate a more organic methodology (like a market-based approach). After watching several different companies try to implement a single data repository and overall data model I have mixed feelings about the whole thing. For the most part, they seemed to be political exercises to try and force compliance in using a solution that did not meet the needs of business units. At the same time, there is very real value to be gained through integration and shared resources (especially with business intelligence). [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
